Bose 2.2 User Manual Page 37

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 155
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 36
This expression means that two infinite planes of dipoles do not interact [121]. In
this limit, the system is translationally invariant in the
xy
-plane, and therefore the
mean-field potential is zero everywhere.
uniform disc
Gaussian
r
B,z
d
lat
(a) (b) (c)
0 1
2
3
-4
-2
0
0
1
-10
-5
0
5
Fig. 2.4, Mean-field potential of two distant dipolar samples:
(a) Schematic
drawing of the system. The two flat samples with the dipoles oriented along
z
are separated by the distance
d
lat
. Dipoles with angle
ϑ < ϑ
m
(red cone) give
negative contributions to the inter-site mean-field potential at the position
ρ
of the probe dipole (tip of the cone). In contrast, for
ϑ > ϑ
m
the contribution
is positive. (b),(c) Inter-site mean-field potential (solid blue line) and density
distribution (dashed black line, normalized to the central density) in homoge-
neous disc-shaped samples and in samples with Gaussian density distribution,
respectively.
Let us now discuss the position dependent inter-site mean-field potential Φ
disc
inter
(
ρ
). For
the geometry of two discs at a given ratio
R/d
lat
= 20, we numerically obtain the result
for Φ
disc
inter
(
ρ
) shown in Fig. 2.4(b). As expected for homogeneous discs, the mean-field
potential close to the center (at
ρ
= 0) is almost constant and negative (see case (ii)
above). Towards the edges, however, the potential develops first a deep minimum and
then a maximum at
ρ & R
, before it eventually approaches the zero value. The behaviour
of Φ
disc
inter
(
ρ
) close to the edge may be understood with the following geometrical argument:
only dipoles within the magic angle
ϑ
m
, indicated by the red cone in Fig. 2.4(a), give a
negative contribution to the mean-field potential since they attract each other. In contrast,
the dipoles just outside the cone give the strongest positive contribution, as the dipolar
potential falls off with
r
3
. Therefore, once the edge of the cone comes closer to the
edge of the neighbouring disc, there are less and less atoms with positive contributions
to the mean-field potential which therefore develops a minimum. For the chosen ratio
R/d
lat
= 20, the minimum sits at the position
ρ ' R d
lat
tan ϑ
m
0
.
9
R
. Further
out, the number of dipoles inside the cone reduces and eventually vanishes, which leads
to the maximum in the mean-field potential. Far outside the disc, the potential finally
approaches the zero value due to the increasing distance to the neighbouring sample.
37
Page view 36
1 2 ... 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 154 155

Comments to this Manuals

No comments