Bose 2.2 User Manual Page 110

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 155
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 109
0.45 ms
0.85 ms 1.25 ms
1.45 ms
1.85 ms
t = 0
0.15 ms
0.40 ms 0.60 ms
1.25 ms
1.45 ms
t = 0
y
z
time t (ms)
6
0.0 0.5
1.0 1.5
9
12
15
in-trap
TOF
U = 12.6
U = 0
U = 3.2
U = 6.3
U = 8.2
k
y
k
z
(a)
(b) (c)
Fig. 6.6, Real-time simulations of the collapsing dBEC:
(a) Time evolution of the
system for a final lattice depth
U
= 12
.
6
E
R
(first row) and
U
= 0
E
R
(second
row). Note that the snapshots in the two sequences are taken at different times
t
, with the time origin set at the end of the lattice ramp. At the time
t
= 0
.
6
ms
the TOF is started, i.e. the trapping potentials are suddenly switched off. (b)
Momentum distribution of the system in the ballistic regime, corresponding to
the spatial density distribution in the far field of the TOF (for
U
= 12
.
6
E
R
,
only the zero-momentum component is shown). (c) Evolution of the atom
numbers N for different final lattice depths U (specified in the figure).
modulation vanishes due to the absence of the lattice potential, as shown in the
second row of the images in Fig. 6.6(a). The condensate then shrinks and shows
strong atom losses while it is still trapped in the harmonic potential. The decay of
the BEC atom number slows down at around
t
= 0
.
5
ms
and after the release from
the trap (at
t
= 0
.
6
ms
) we do not observe any atom losses anymore. The simulations
therefore confirm our hypothesis that, for
U
= 0
E
R
, the collapse is initiated in the
trap. In addition, the simulations show a loss of about 60% of the atoms within the
first 0
.
5
ms
of the in-trap holding time, which is close to our experimental results.
During the TOF, the cloud explodes mainly radially. Its shape in the far field of
the TOF (see Fig. 6.6(b)) is similar to the one observed in the experiment for the
longest applied holding time.
(ii)
Considering the stable in-trap configurations
U
= 12
.
6
E
R
and
U
= 8
.
2
E
R
, the
evolution of the atom number, shown in Fig. 6.6(c), clearly supports the hypothesis
of the TOF-triggered collapse: while there are almost no in-trap atom losses, we
observe a sudden drop in the atom number only some time after switching off the
trapping potentials. For
U
= 12
.
6
E
R
the drop occurs at
t '
1
.
45
ms
, where we also
110
Page view 109
1 2 ... 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 ... 154 155

Comments to this Manuals

No comments