Bose 2.2 User Manual Page 77

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 155
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 76
In the regime 0
< U
lat
< U
fix
, we calculate the equilibrium atom number distribution in
the lattice, given by Eq.
(4.20)
, for the different lattice depths used in the experiment. We
then perform the TOF simulations, independently expanding the on-site condensates as
explained in Ref. [89, Ch.13]. In this procedure, we approximate the on-site wave functions
by 1D Gaussians of width σ = a
lat
and with equal phases ϕ
j
= 0.
When reaching the lattice depth
U
fix
, we model the suppression of the tunneling by fixing
the on-site populations
N
j
such that
N
j
(
U
lat
> U
fix
) =
N
j
(
U
fix
). We now perform real-time
simulations of the evolution of the independent phases
ϕ
j
(
t
) of the separated on-site
condensates: we split the linear lattice ramp into small time intervals
t
(
µ
0
/~
)
1
, with
µ
0
the local chemical potential on the central lattice site. Then, we let the phases
ϕ
j
(
t
)
evolve linearly in time with
ϕ
j
(
t
+
t
) =
ϕ
j
(
t
) +
e
µ
(
z
=
jd
lat
)
t/~
, where
e
µ
(
z
=
jd
lat
) is
the position-dependent chemical potential introduced in section 4.3.2. Finally, we simulate
the TOF procedure at regular time intervals of the loading time, as explained above.
The results of the simulations are shown in Fig. 4.6(b), next to the experimental data.
Choosing the threshold
U
fix
= 13
E
R
for the suppression of the tunneling, we can reproduce
the main features observed in the experiment. We observe initially the discrete momentum
peaks that we expect from the interference of a coherent array of condensates. Interestingly,
the on-site condensates show a significant dephasing (indicated by the multi-peak structure
after TOF) only at a lattice depth
U
lat
39
E
R
, much larger than the value
U
fix
. This is
an effect of both, the weak dependence
e
µ U
1/8
lat
of the chemical potential on the lattice
depth and the timing of the experiment, i.e. the ramping speed of the lattice potential.
We see that we can model the measured phase dynamics of the dipolar
52
Cr condensate
in the lattice by considering only contact interactions and a deterministic phase evolution
between the on-site condensates. Indeed, it was shown in Ref. [51] that, in a 1D optical
lattice, the effect of the on-site dipolar interactions on the phases of the condensates
can be accounted for by introducing an effective
s
-wave scattering length. This effective
scattering length replaces the true scattering length
a
, but the basic description of the
system remains the same. The effect of the inter-site dipolar interactions on the phase
dynamics of the system is typically small, as investigated also in Ref. [51].
Understanding the in-trap phase dynamics and the resulting density patterns after the
TOF is required to interpret correctly the absorption images collected in our experiments.
In particular, the dephasing of the on-site condensates in the deep lattice regime has
consequences for our measurements: we have to adapt our evaluation routine of the
absorption images to cope with the multi-peak patterns, as we explain in detail in
section 5.3.1. Furthermore, our investigations of the collapse dynamics of a dipolar BEC
in chapter 6 greatly rely on the discussion of the expansion of a BEC from the lattice.
In this chapter, we could explain all experimental observations even without taking into
account the dipolar interactions. The situation is different, however, when entering the
strongly dipolar regime for sufficiently low
s
-wave scattering lengths. Then, the dipolar
77
Page view 76
1 2 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 ... 154 155

Comments to this Manuals

No comments