Bose 2.2 User Manual Page 55

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 155
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 54
actly within the TF approximation
51
[169]. We are thus able to numerically calculate
the values
R
5
y
/N
and
R
5
z
/N
after TOF as a function of the scattering length, where
R
y
(
R
z
) is the Thomas-Fermi-radius of the BEC in the
y
-direction (
z
-direction). The result
of such calculations are shown in Fig. 3.4(a), for typical experimental parameters. For
a &
40
a
0
both values scale linearly with the scattering length, comparable to the case of a
non-dipolar BEC. In the regime
a <
40
a
0
, however, the linear scaling is only observed in
the
y
-direction, i.e. transverse to the alignment of the dipoles. Using a cigar-shaped trap
(
ω
x
, ω
y
> ω
z
), the value
R
5
y
/N
tends to zero when
52
a a
dd
'
15
a
0
. Thus, the scaling of
R
5
y
/N with the scattering length is well described by the empirical formula
R
5
y
N
= σ (a a
offset
) , (3.2a)
leading to
a = σ
1
R
5
y
N
+ a
offset
, (3.2b)
where the parameters
σ
and
a
offset
can be obtained from a linear fit to the calculated
values of
R
5
y
N
(
a
), as shown in Fig. 3.4(b). In principle, we can measure
R
y
and
N
at
different values of the magnetic field strength
B
close to the Feshbach resonance, and
obtain the scattering length
a
(
B
) via the relation
(3.2b)
. In practice, it turns out that the
uncertainties on the trapping frequencies, on the BEC radius and on the atom numbers
are too large to perform an accurate calibration in such direct way. Nonetheless, we
have performed measurements of
R
5
y
/N
in low magnetic field (far from the Feshbach
resonance) where
a
=
a
/jointfilesconvert/317304/bg
and find a deviation of only 6
.
2% to the value calculated in the
TF approximation (see Fig. 3.4(b)).
Considering the form of Eq.
(3.2b)
, we see that any systematic scaling uncertainty on
R
5
y
/N
may be absorbed by replacing the calculated parameter
σ
by an effective value,
σ
σ
eff
. Since we know precisely the background value of the scattering length,
a
/jointfilesconvert/317304/bg
= (102
.
5
±
0
.
4)
a
0
[144], we obtain
σ
eff
directly from the expansion measurements, with the detailed
procedure given in appendix A.7. Thus, the only required input from the calculations
is the parameter
a
offset
. With the trap frequencies
ω
(x,y,z)
= 2
π ·
(680
,
624
,
270)
Hz
, we
obtain the value
a
offset
= (14
±
1)
a
0
from the calculations in the TF approximation.
Since the parameter
a
offset
is a crucial input in the calibration of the scattering length,
we compare the TF-calculations to full numerical simulations of the expansion of the
dBEC
53
, which yield the slightly different value
a
offset
= (9
±
1)
a
0
(see Fig. 3.4(b)). We
are using this latter value of
a
offset
for the calibration of the scattering length, since the
51
In Ref. [169] a sign problem occurs in the expansion formulae. The corrected formualae are given
explicitely in Ref. [113, A.5.9].
52
In calculations without dipolar interactions we find the zero crossing at a = 0 a
0
.
53
The simulations are performed by K. Pawłowski from the theory group of K. Rzążewski in Warsaw,
using the numerical methods described in Ref. [118].
55
Page view 54
1 2 ... 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 154 155

Comments to this Manuals

No comments