Bose 2.2 User Manual Page 56

  • Download
  • Add to my manuals
  • Print
  • Page
    / 155
  • Table of contents
  • BOOKMARKS
  • Rated. / 5. Based on customer reviews
Page view 55
0
0 20
40
60 80 100
10
20
30
(a) (b)
dipolar expansion (TF) TF vs. simulations
TF
simulations
0 20 40 60 80 100
10
0
20
30
40
Fig. 3.4, Dipolar expansion:
(a) Ratios
R
5
y
/N
(red dots) and
R
5
z
/N
(blue dots), calcu-
lated for different scattering lengths using the TF approximation (parameters:
ω
x,y,z
= 2
π ·
(680
,
624
,
270)
Hz
,
t
tof
= 7
ms
,
N
= 20
,
000). (b) Results of the
calculations for
R
5
y
/N
in the TF approximation (red dots) and using full numer-
ical simulations (green dots). The lines are linear fits to the data from which
we extract the value
a
offset
(see text). The experimental datapoint (black dot)
is taken at
a
=
a
/jointfilesconvert/317304/bg
in low magnetic field, where we obtain smaller uncertainties
on R
5
y
/N than in the measurements close to the FR.
simulations are expected to recover more closely the dynamics of the real dipolar BEC
than the calculations within the TF approximation.
Measurements
In a typical calibration measurement, we create a BEC at
B
626
G
(
B
578
G
) when
measuring above (below) the FR. Then, we ramp the magnetic field to a value closer to
the FR and hold the system for 4
ms
at this value, for it to equilibrate. We then switch
off the optical dipole trap and perform a 7
ms
TOF before we take an absorption image of
the cloud. Using a bimodal fit (accounting for the BEC and for the remaining thermal
atoms), we extract the condensate radius
R
y
and the BEC atom number
54
N
. In this way,
we take at least four datapoints for each programmed current
I
FB
in the Feshbach coils to
reduce the uncertainties on the values R
5
y
/N(I
FB
).
Fitting procedure
The fitting of the data is performed in a two-step process (see appendix A.7 for details):
We first fit the scaling parameter
σ
eff
and calculate the scattering length values
a
exp
(
I
FB
)
via Eq.
(3.2b)
from the measured values
R
5
y
/N
(
I
FB
). In a second fitting procedure, the
54
With the strong Feshbach field oriented along
z
, we cannot provide the maximum absorption cross
section for the imaging light (propagating along
x
) [36]. We thus record a lower atom number in the
absorption images than actually contained in the BEC. However, this effect is fully accounted for in our
evaluation procedure, by introducing the effective scaling parameter σ
eff
.
56
Page view 55
1 2 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 ... 154 155

Comments to this Manuals

No comments